08 December 2016
Chris Pickles

Chris Pickles

Chris Pickles - Picklesnet Ltd

109Posts 279,866Views 18Comments

Dematerialisation and digital notaries

24 January 2013  |  3486 views  |  1

Reading on Finextra last week about dematerialisation in the Netherlands reminded me about the issues that you face when you want to move from paper documents to electronic documents – particularly when those documents have a legal and transactional importance.  Information that investment firms depend on - term sheets, prospectuses, corporate actions, trade reporting, etc – flows through systems, but how do you know that the information hasn’t been changed at some point along the way?

For some documents you want to have the original and sole version: a cheque would be an example of that, because only the original is valid and you also don’t want people copying cheques and re-using the copies fraudulently.  But probably for most of the data that firms move around, you don’t want the original data – you don’t want the sender to delete the bytes from their computer and send those original bytes to your computer.  You want a digital copy of the original data.  And in many situations you want to know that that copy is complete and a true unchanged copy of the original.  If one comma has changed or if one digital bit is different, you want to know about it.

We depend so much on all of this data that in some ways it’s surprising that we don’t check the validity of data as much as we should.  Typically we depend on someone further up the data “food chain” – but how often do we check for validity and completeness of data when we depend on those two characteristics?

Digital notaries can provide that validation, letting you check that the data that you receive – the term sheet, the prospectus, corporate action, trade report - is complete and unchanged, just as the originator created it.  Digital notary services can be critical to successful dematerialisation projects.

TagsPost-trade & opsTransaction banking

Comments: (1)

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 25 January, 2013, 14:30

People may not settle for anything but the original of a cheque but, ironically, cheque truncation has proven to be a highly successful use case for digitization of physical objects. On the other hand, adoption of digitization has been well below expectation for bills, statements and other brick-and-mortar items where a trusted digital copy would appear to suffice. This suggests that the critical success factor for digitization is closely related to whether the natural consequences of digitization - passwords, for example - are compatible with pre-existing processes and user behavior. In the case of cheques, they are; and, as I'd highlighted in How Suitable Is Email For Delivering Bills And Statements?, in the case of bills and statements, they are not.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Chris

Will the UK lose its right to issue ISINs?

15 March 2016  |  4855 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsBrexit

Using instrument identifiers to reduce latency

27 January 2016  |  3189 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & ops

Mobile Payments and LSD

21 January 2016  |  2502 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlinePayments

MiFIR: How ISINs Work: 7

17 December 2015  |  3921 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

MiFIR: How ISINs Work: 6

14 December 2015  |  2629 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Chris's profile

job title Consultant
location Waterlooville
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
I help organisations that work in the financial sector around the world to understand better how the sector works, how regulations impact the business operations of financial institutions, and how to...

Chris's expertise

What Chris reads
Chris writes about

Who's commenting on Chris's posts

Ketharaman Swaminathan