With the unprecedented rate of change in the financial markets, and with regulators across the board stepping up the enforcement of existing regulation, one can’t help but wonder:
what does this mean for the compliance officer?
Compliance officers are facing a deluge of new regulations on top of an existing heap of rules and requirements which makes oversight of all compliance consequences difficult to gain. Compliance officers need to spend increasing amounts of time reading consultation
papers, providing feedback, and then reading new guidelines and regulations as they become available. They then need to ensure that systems and processes are updated to match new requirements, often to very tight deadlines imposed by regulators. They should
also not underestimate the risk of accidental breaches, even if one has the best intentions in mind. Ultimately, the compliance officer today needs to focus on convincing internal stakeholders and budget keepers to spend money and increase headcount – a tall
order in today’s regulatory climate.
At the same time, new trading structures and advanced trading strategies coupled with huge data sets makes the task to monitor trading activities and markets a very interesting challenge today. If monitoring is executed properly, it can provide useful feedback
to business functions on its performance, and early detection of misconfigured OMS/algo systems can be vital to avoiding mistakes and poor trading results, or even accidental market abuse.
Within all of this, compliance officers are finding they must manage a delicate balance between business interests, culture, increasing cost pressures and heightened regulatory demands on reporting, due diligence monitoring, and surveillance. To add even
more pressure, the compliance officer is now taking on increased personal risk. If major misconduct is revealed within an organization, the compliance staff can be held personally accountable.
If this doesn’t put the compliance officer between a rock and a hard place, I don’t know what does. Why would anyone in his right mind want to find himself in this position?
Is there an upside to the story, or should a compliance officer just cut his losses and run?
The flip side of the new world for the compliance staff is the ability to create a platform for increased job satisfaction. Because of the increased focus on rules enforcement, a compliance officer is gaining increased authority and clout to do a thorough
job. And since that is the case, it is now gradually becoming more likely for a head of compliance to secure budgets and resources to deploy systems and processes that are up to the task.
As the global trading environment gets more and more complex, the compliance function is getting the ears of senior management and is now forming part of corporate risk thinking. A strong compliance and trading monitoring function coupled with the right
systems and strategies have become critical, and say to the outside world: “We are a firm that takes fair and orderly trading and transparency seriously. You can trust your transactions to be safe with us.” Who wouldn’t want to be a key part of fulfilling