11 December 2016

44975

Retired Member

2,018Posts 6,641,654Views 2,336Comments

You get what you pay for

11 July 2012  |  3724 views  |  0

Clients and suppliers need strong complementary capabilities to make IT outsourcing relationships successful. Extensive studies have shown this to be a fact. The offshore factory with the cheapest service model doesn’t normally provide the best results.

There is little need to acknowledge how difficult the current economic situation is at present. But we do need to understand and address the challenges that it is presenting to businesses across the industry. One such problem is the lack of IT staff in banks to manage their internal IT systems as well as to innovate.

The technical failure recently seen at RBS is yet to be analysed, however there is a widely reported perception that the software update that went so badly wrong was fairly quickly identified and patched by the bank; however, it was the absence of a contingency plan to deal with the knock-on issues from the initial computer failure that was more worrying. This, to me, reinforces the studies that demonstrate the need for the external service provider to have a high competence in the domain, as well as in service provision.

Research shows that banks consider outsourcing IT services not only to reduce costs, but to focus on core capabilities, as well as to gain a resource ‘skills injection’, including expertise and superior technology needed to improve IT performance. This is a sound policy. Many banks use legacy IT applications that are continually adapted to deliver contemporary services, and the knowledge to manage the day-to-day operations as well as problem solving are key to a good delivery service for the bank.

A specialist application management service provider can manage the systems in the IT domain as well as augment the incumbent skills. This combination of human and technical resource management can reduce the reliance on individual contractors, drive efficiencies and add value. The bank’s own employees become flexible and thus able to work on innovation and value-add services.

In a time when banks are looking to maximise business agility to achieve innovation, it surely pays to get the best people to manage the run-the-bank legacy, doesn’t it?

TagsRisk & regulationWholesale banking

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Retired

An industry matured: highlights from Mobey Day 2016

18 October 2016  |  959 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingInnovation

Reorganising for the Age of Collaboration

27 September 2016  |  2549 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Fintech innovation in the B2B space has only just begun

12 September 2016  |  13684 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

Protecting Data with DLP

23 August 2016  |  5361 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurityBrexit

How to end what ails online commerce

22 August 2016  |  4793 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsTransaction banking

Retired's profile

job title
location
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Retired's expertise

What Retired reads
Retired writes about

Who's commenting on Retired's posts

Alex Aleksandrovski
Ketharaman Swaminathan
João Bohner
Steven Hatton
Graham Seel
Nikhil Thadani
Gerard Hergenroeder
Konstantin Rabin
Dharmesh Mistry
Matt Schofield
Anna Robert
Ian Davis