17 January 2018
Gary Wright

Gary Wright

Gary Wright - BISS Research

277Posts 1,055,864Views 369Comments
Finextra community

Post-Trade Forum

The Post Trade Forum's aim is to propagate debate and discussion between senior practitioners in Post Trade Operations in the global securities market; to bring about increased awareness and knowledge across both buy-side and sell-side financial institutions in financial products and be a focal point for firms and practitioners to air views.

The business benefit of T2S

11 May 2012  |  3568 views  |  0

Ah!  I can hear you all crying that title as T2S draws ever closer and it creeps on to the development agenda. What is the business benefit? For once it’s not a regulatory driven change (Although it’s certainly political) so why should firms in the market get excited?

Excited is probably the wrong word as it is more about plumbing than rockets to the moon. Politically T2S has a vital role and is virtually a mandate development for the European single market. Without it would a single Capital Market in Europe be realised? The answer is probably between no and maybe and why T2S has been having such a troubled journey to date.

Over the last decade or two, the whole market appears to only develop, because of regulatory push. But T2S gives a real opportunity for the European Capital Markets and its players, including investors, to rebalance portfolios as Pan- European, without the enormous cost of settlement agent selection, system development and the operational risk in cross-border investing and settlement.

Financial Services firms hitherto not putting their clients into Pan European opportunities because of the cost and lack of infra-structure will be able to. Business should be increased due to more investment and should attract more clients on a Pan-European basis. Why shouldn’t a small UK Wealth Manager offer services to a French or German investor? T2S will make this more likely.

The rub, is the cost of T2S and this has been variously published at between EUR 150M to EUR 400M depending on where you look. All this will be recovered with a user charge and presumably break even at no cost at some time in the future.

The decision firms need to make is simple. The cost of taking part vs. the benefit of increased business going forward. But what will be the technology costs in order to play? This is one question I will be posing at the next Post Trade Forum debate on the morning of the 26th June at the London Stock Exchange.

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Gary

Wealth Management - Turkeys Vote for Christmas

27 September 2013  |  3754 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

The future of systems in financial services

29 July 2013  |  3465 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Social media and trust in financial markets

25 June 2013  |  6036 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Technology changing the markets

25 June 2013  |  3350 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Technology begins to change

14 June 2013  |  2875 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0

Gary's profile

job title Analyst
location London
member since 2007
Summary profile See full profile »
CEO of B.I.S.S. Research, founder of the BISS Independent Accreditation for all systems and services provided to financial services companies internationally. Guest Lecturer at Reading University and...

Gary's expertise

Member since 2007
277 posts369 comments

Who's commenting on Gary's posts