21 October 2016
Steve Grob

Fidessa Fragmentation Index

Steve Grob - Fidessa

129Posts 454,818Views 3Comments

And another thing Europe can't agree about

23 February 2012  |  3038 views  |  0

Two stories this week demonstrated that Greece isn’t the only thing Europe has to disagree about. Together they both help highlight the problem regulators have worldwide with HFT. The first story, by the FT’s Jeremy Grant, describes how Italy’s Borsa Italiana is bowing to Consob pressure and introducing a fee structure that will charge participants more depending upon the number of orders they submit. This effectively introduces a tax on the HFT community because their business model is predicated on a much higher order to fill ratio. The rationale for this is that HFT somehow distorts markets and so this is needed in order to achieve “stability”. And yet, not so far away, the Swedish regulator claims that “the negative effects related to high-frequency and algorithmic trading are limited”. Worse still is the situation in Australia where the new ballooning regulation costs are being divided up in accordance with the numbers of orders submitted. Apparently this is not intended as a direct tax on HFT but a way of reflecting the extra effort involved in supervising these firms. The net effect, however, is just the same.

Part of the problem lies in coming up with a definition of HFT that everyone agrees upon, but the real problem lies with the regulators themselves. When they were busy introducing multi-market structures, why didn’t they think that this would lead to a huge increase in HFT? Splitting liquidity over multiple destinations and the subsequent introduction of maker taker pricing provides the ideal breeding ground for arbitrage. And, of course, exchanges around the world have been busy building the fastest race tracks they can in order to attract the same HFT players too.

Maybe it’s because HFT is such a nebulous concept that it becomes such an easy scapegoat. Firms can always claim that any sanctions aren’t really directed at them but, just like Greece, I guess the debate will go on forever.

TagsTrade execution

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Steve

Anyone for MiFID 3?

12 October 2016  |  3268 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Blockchain is the answer but not in the way you think

27 September 2016  |  3294 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsBlockchainPost-trade & ops

Central Risk Books - the new black for capital markets

20 September 2016  |  3607 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Mexico blues

27 July 2016  |  3657 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Brexit hangover

30 June 2016  |  3406 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionRisk & regulationBrexit

Steve's profile

job title Director of Group Strategy
location London
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
I am responsible for strategic development at Fidessa. This includes the development of new geographic markets and strategic partnerships and driving new industry initiatives. As part of this I head u...

Steve's expertise

What Steve reads
Steve writes about

Who's commenting on Steve's posts

Xavier Barrier
Ketharaman Swaminathan