24 September 2017
Andy Morris

Andy Morris

Andy Morris - ACI Worldwide

9Posts 33,730Views 4Comments

The rise of first party fraud

22 July 2010  |  6270 views  |  1

First party fraud continues to be a challenge facing institutions and is, arguably, a necessary evil of doing business for institutions today. However, this also can prove problematic when also trying to balance regulatory and consumer pressure to treat customers fairly.  Here the advantage tips in favour of the fraudster: how do institutions manage and treat a customer that they suspect of showing symptoms of first party fraud - fairly. Just look at some of the consumer web forums describing tales of woe where customers or credit applicants have negative registrations against their credit history – purportedly for account misuse or supplying false or misleading information.  However, let’s not lose sight of the fact that dishonestly making a false representation is now recognised as a criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006. 

Hence, how the institution identifies and manages a suspected first party fraud customer requires very careful tact and diplomacy - assuming of course the institution was able to recognise the symptoms of first party fraud verse genuine bad debt. There will also be a “tipping point” when the fraudster becomes suspicious that the bank knows what is going on, leading them to perpetrate their crime earlier than anticipated. 

There are a number of subtle differentiations between first party fraud and bad debt, and how this impacts upon institutions today. First party fraud refers to cases where a consumer opens a credit or debit account and uses it to make payments and purchases that they don’t plan to pay for. It is a pre-meditated fraud where applications for funds are submitted based upon legitimate information which is supported by verified identification. Once accepted in the system the fraudster uses various payment methods such as credit, debit cards and cheques to make purchases with no intention of actually paying, leaving the merchant, financial institution or payment scheme at a financial loss.  

What is becoming clearer in these recessionary times is just how fine the line is between bad debt and first party fraud. The main challenge banks face in preventing first party fraud is to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it is pre-meditated and not simply a genuine inability to pay a bill.

The best way to combat first party fraud is to monitor customers and attempt to detect it before it has even taken place. This may sound ambitious but there are identifiable fraudster characteristics which tend to be consistent across the globe. For example there is a greater propensity for a certain age bracket to commit first party fraud. Once these characteristics are identified, banks should scrutinize and observe trends to distinguish between routine and inconsistent activity. A combined strategy of predictive analytics and full end-to-end payment and transaction monitoring best positions financial institutions to deter and shut down first-party fraud. If a customer is identified as suspicious, the activity can then be checked before the fraud is perpetrated thus reducing the risk to the institution. The key to assessing this successfully and reducing the frequency of false positives is by having a real time holistic view of the customer across all of their accounts.

First party fraud is more likely to grow rather than subside going forward. The recent recession has played a role in cash strapped individuals reverting to fraudulent activity to attain goods, which has been reflected in the increase in the level of fraudulent activity since the recession has escalated. While banks have previously gone to great lengths to protect their customers from third party fraud, they must now also take action to protect themselves from the risk of financial loss as a result of first party fraud.


Comments: (1)

Uri Rivner
Uri Rivner - BioCatch - Tel Aviv | 27 July, 2010, 08:24

Good analysis. Re: leveraging the bad economy to hide first party new account applications, I wrote a blog about this called Riders on the Storm: http://www.finextra.com/community/fullblog.aspx?id=2904

The first part talks about why mules needed for third party fraud (account takeover) are easy to recruit, and the second part focuses on first party fraud.


Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Andy

One step forward and two steps back for Fraud in the UK

17 March 2014  |  2198 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurityPayments

What do EMV, payments fraud and the Top 40 have in common?

10 October 2013  |  4383 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 1 TagsSecurityPayments

Give mobile a chance

07 June 2013  |  2987 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlinePayments

Shock and Awe - NFA Fraud indicator puts fraud at 73bn GBP

04 April 2012  |  3861 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsRisk & regulation

Is the War on Fraud being won?

07 March 2012  |  3351 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsSecurityPayments

Andy's profile

job title Risk Business Solutions Consultant
location Watford
member since 2008
Summary profile See full profile »
Andy provides assistance to ACI's risk business solutions group and Proactive Risk Manager solution

Andy's expertise

Member since 2008
9 posts4 comments
What Andy reads

Who's commenting on Andy's posts