25 October 2016
Chris Pickles

Chris Pickles

Chris Pickles - Picklesnet Ltd

109Posts 276,485Views 18Comments

DMA and Exchanges

11 June 2007  |  1241 views  |  0

Maybe after MiFID we’ll need to change the way that we use English.  Why do we call off-exchange trading “Over The Counter”? (because we don’t think of on-exchange trading as being “under the counter”, do we).  Many of us would find it hard to explain the difference in English between a trade and a transaction – yet trade reporting and transaction reporting mean two totally different things.  And in London a trade done “on market” means “on exchange”.

Today in Europe, Direct Market Access generally means for a buy-side firm to go directly through a broker’s system to get to the “market” – the on-exchange trading system to which the broker subscribes.  So do we call DMA something different when the broker’s own system, and not an exchange, is the target market for the trade?

With brokers working on shared execution venues, such as Project Boat and Ch-X, and on their own proprietary internalisation platforms, buy-side firms are likely to need more direct access to marketplaces than ever before.

Likewise, we talk about an “exchange” as being “the market”.  The London Stock Exchange operates multiple markets – the Main Market, AIM, EUROSETS, etc – as does Deutsche Boerse, Euronext, etc.  An exchange is not necessarily a regulated market: the LSE Main Market is defined as a “regulated market” under MiFID, but AIM isn’t.  Post-MiFID, the Main Market will remain as a regulated market, because it is regulated by the national market regulator, whereas AIM would be classed as an MTF, because it is regulated by the London Stock Exchange itself.

Directly accessing a broker’s execution venue should be faster than going through the broker’s system to access an exchange’s systems, thereby offering potential advantages in reduced latency.  Reduced latency should attract order flow.

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Chris

Will the UK lose its right to issue ISINs?

15 March 2016  |  4800 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsBrexit

Using instrument identifiers to reduce latency

27 January 2016  |  3130 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & ops

Mobile Payments and LSD

21 January 2016  |  2458 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlinePayments

MiFIR: How ISINs Work: 7

17 December 2015  |  3855 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

MiFIR: How ISINs Work: 6

14 December 2015  |  2579 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Chris's profile

job title Consultant
location Waterlooville
member since 2009
Summary profile See full profile »
I help organisations that work in the financial sector around the world to understand better how the sector works, how regulations impact the business operations of financial institutions, and how to...

Chris's expertise

What Chris reads
Chris writes about

Who's commenting on Chris's posts

Bruno  Schütterle
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Andrew Muir
Roger Storm
John Lathouwers