23 October 2017
Paul Taylor


Paul Taylor - Swift

7Posts 28,013Views 2Comments
Finextra community

Post-Trade Forum

The Post Trade Forum's aim is to propagate debate and discussion between senior practitioners in Post Trade Operations in the global securities market; to bring about increased awareness and knowledge across both buy-side and sell-side financial institutions in financial products and be a focal point for firms and practitioners to air views.

Static Data, a closed topic?

01 July 2013  |  4911 views  |  0

Static Data, quite simply information by which financial services firms can identify where to settle transactions, and indeed identify their counterparts.

Then why so difficult? Many claim to have ‘globalised standardised’ reference data platforms, but with around a third of transactions failing due to static differences, and indeed in the event of market default, claims remaining outstanding for years, surely there is a gap in the process..

To clarify with whom you have traded, and indeed the destination of funds or securities is of paramount importance in both trade, and post-trade spaces.

Again, to confirm and match these aspects is a key efficiency play (also reducing resultant cost) for financial institutions, and should form a central part of the post trade matching process.

Platforms with closed user group approaches only assist those who are a ‘member of the club’, whereas those with a more open infrastructure where said data can be shared, much better for the community at large.

With Europe defining their own approach for transaction reporting under ESMA/EMIR, and the US established with CFTC/Dodd Frank, there seems to be a real risk of another split process forming around this critically important process.

Clearly, where mandated, the ability to match Identifiers is also important, especially where regulation mandates that both parties are responsible, if a global standard is not set, there is a risk of as many differences in the new process, as there was in the ‘old’ process.  The Legal Entity Identifier will help start resolving challenges in this space, but I believe a more open, collaborative approach to Static Data management would avoid closed group pitfalls and address further inefficiency in the post trade process.


TagsTrade executionPost-trade & ops

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Paul

A different kind of Water Bill HR3317

13 November 2013  |  2109 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationGroupFinancial Services Regulation


16 October 2013  |  2313 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

What comes before regulatory compliance?

27 September 2013  |  5617 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & opsGroupPost-Trade Forum

Alternative routes to cost reduction..

09 August 2013  |  4059 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsGroupPost-Trade Forum

Static Data, a closed topic?

01 July 2013  |  4911 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 2 TagsTrade executionPost-trade & opsGroupPost-Trade Forum

Paul's profile

job title Compliance Services Business Development
location London
member since 2012
Summary profile See full profile »
Global Responsibility for Compliance Services Business Development. SWIFT Compliance Services span Sanctions Screening, Testing, with a strategic roadmap to offer KYC Registry, AML and Business Int...

Paul's expertise

Member since 2012
7 posts2 comments
What Paul reads
Paul's blog archive
2013 (7)

Who's commenting on Paul's posts