Blog article
See all stories ยป

The Finextra Fun Badge Buzzword Bingo Game

Do you facilitate disruptive environments in order to engage GenY, digital natives?

Are you involved in the gamification of the customer experience?

Do work for a 'social' business?

Will banking as we know it be disrupted by dramatic consumer behaviour shifts?

Can anyone tell me what any of the above actually means? Really? In plain, simple language? Because, seriously, if you can't explain what you do to your grandmother - you don't understand what you do. Trust me, I used to edit a newsletter on derivatives trading. 

Let's dissect one of these sentences. The last came from Bank 2.0/Movenbank founder Brett King. 

"Banking..." - Ok, straight forward enough, most people know what 'banking' is, wouldn't call a buzzword. But should I assume you mean 'retail banking'? We're not talking about investment banking or merchant banking or transaction banking, correct? I just want to be clear.

"...as we know it..." Who's 'we'? This is right up there with 'People say...'

"...will be disrupted by dramatic consumer behaviour shifts." Which behaviour and how and where is it shifting to? 

Despite all the 'descriptive language' this sentence is pretty vague, actually. Is Brett talking about how customer 'pay' for merchandise, apply for mortgages, invest in pensions, choose the 'Spanish' option on ATMs just for the hell of it?

Really, I might conclude any of the following from that sentence:

  • Retail banking customers in Manchester have decided en masse to communicate with in-branch tellers via America sign language. 
  • Corporate clients in Brazil have asked their bank providers to refer to their treasurers as 'Gary' (whether they are male or female) every other month (outside of leap years).
  • Famers in Montana have demanded that all their credit card statements be delivered via signing cowboy grams.

All would be pretty dramatic and disruptive wouldn't it? I would even say it would change 'banking as we know it'. Do you think this is it what Brett meant? 

Saying exactly what you mean, in plain simple language, is the best way to ensure you are understood by all (even by silly journalists trying to be funny on a Friday). 

I'm not trying to pick on Brett (he's not the only 'flowery' language offender) but he did admit on Twitter "...Problem is if I have to eliminate those buzzwords, I have nothing left to talk about..." 

My challenge to him is - try it. 

Now, I owe the title of this Friday blog to Aden Davies (@Aden_76). We have a number of fun events coming up at Finextra next year - a big mobile event and, of course, Social Media Days. I'm going to think up some, oh-so-cool, badges for all the buzzword lovers out there. 

Our list so far:

  • GenY/Millennial
  • 'Game-changer' (special edition travel Scrabble for the worst offender)
  • Digital Native
  • Engagement
  • Leverage
  • Synergies
  • 'Social' -(without defining what you mean)
  • Distributive
  • Innovation (when it isn't new!)
  • Gamification
  • and anything 2.0

Can you think of anymore? Answer via carrier pigeon, please.

5963

Comments: (4)

Elizabeth Lumley
Elizabeth Lumley - Girl, Disrupted - Crayford 02 December, 2011, 16:12Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Ah, 'paradigm shift' - an oldie, but a goodie

Brett King
Brett King - Moven - New York 02 December, 2011, 23:20Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Liz,

I appreciate that this is largely tongue in cheek, but thankfully FinExtra gives me the ability to defend snarky slights against my verbose character :)

In my defense the comment you dissected was made with the severe transmission limitations of Twitter's 140 characters. So calling me out for not giving clarity to a statement via the Twitter medium is a little tough. It was a provactive statement, I'll grant you. It may even require further explanation if you've never heard my ideas in that respect before. However, Twitter as a medium, is not articulate enough to provide that which you say you are looking for in a serious discussion about the industry.

I do often talk about disruptive behavioral shifts, for example, and I believe I've explained my thoughts on that via numerous forums with abundant clarity - I'm sure no one is unsure of what my views on the matter are and why I classify it as such. The fact is, disrupted by dramatic consumer behaviour shifts is exactly the right term to describe what is happening in the retail FI space. Water it down with less dramatic language and you might let a banker think that he has plenty of time before he has to change the way he does business - he does not.

Just ask Borders and Blockbuster if consumer behavioral changes have been disruptive to their businesses or dramatic?

I stand by the emphatic nature of my language, if only because we are in desparate times and need a big change in our approach and thinking. Being soft on this, or pulling punches because it may be seen as a little dramatic, isn't going to help anyone - consumers or industry pundits alike. 

And don't worry... I have plenty left to talk about :)

Brett King
BANK 2.0 

Elizabeth Lumley
Elizabeth Lumley - Girl, Disrupted - Crayford 05 December, 2011, 10:10Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

OK, fair enough. I take your point about Twitter (I did grab the latest quote, which happened to come via Twitter)

However, I disagree with you that using simple, easy to understand language and spelling out exactly what you mean, without relying on jargon, buzzwords or vague statements makes your argument 'soft'. I would argue - it makes an argument stronger. 

Which statement is stronger?

  • Retail banking customer behaviour is changing
  • 'X-percentage of retail banking customer aged between 18 and 29 have not entered a branch in the past three years - according to [very expensive research house that looks into these things]'

Guess which one would be covered by Finextra?

Not to go off-topic. But I think your comparison to the decline of Borders et all is a bit 'apples & oranges'. Amazon didn't partner with Barnes & Nobel and Borders when it launched - it partnered with the book publishers and depositories - much like your own cardless, paperless, mobile start-up and the 'Simple personal finance site formerly known as Bank...' will need to partner with that four-letter B word.

What brought down Borders has as much to do with it being saddled with massive amounts of suburban real estate it couldn't shift as it has with changes in customer buying habits. But that is another discussion...

You still haven't convinced me that explaining exactly what you mean in simple language doesn't trump a buzzword every time. 

Brett King
Brett King - Moven - New York 05 December, 2011, 10:54Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Actually Liz, Amazon did exactly that which you say they didn't with Borders. In 2001, Borders - fearing the dot com bubble collapse - wrote off their online business. They outsourced it to Amazon.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/59638/Borders_Turns_to_Amazon_for_Outsourcing

By 2006, Amazon was doing $170m through the Borders.com website. 

Why did Borders go the way of the Dodo? Maybe because they had no alternative revenue...

The analogy fits.

BK

Elizabeth Lumley

Elizabeth Lumley

Global FinTech Commentator

Girl, Disrupted

Member since

05 Nov 2007

Location

Crayford

Blog posts

165

Comments

173

More from Elizabeth

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Whatever...

A place to share stuff that isn't at all fintec related but is amusing, absurd or scary.


See all

Now hiring