21 October 2017
Colin Kerr

50970

Colin Kerr - Microsoft Corp

6Posts 30,632Views 2Comments

Stimulus for Road Construction? How about Payments!

20 September 2010  |  3474 views  |  3

Living in the Chicago area,  I've spent my fair share of time in traffic congestion trying to get to the airport. (Anyone familiar with Chicago ORD will also know that finding a plane that leaves on time is another challenge - but that's a different story).  Chicago is known for having only two seasons - winter, and construction season. This past summer has seen reconstruction of the roads in full gear as projects from the stimulus funds (correctly known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009)) kicked in. My frequent rides to the airport now take much longer than usual, and a recent trip had me thinking about national payments infrastructures and what it takes to modernize them.

At the risk of being drawn into a political discussion (I won't), it seems to me as a layman that there are many roads in the US being rebuilt that still had some life left in them. They weren't perfect and had been patched and repaired, but in large part I wouldn't have put them on the priority list for rebuilding. Pre-stimulus, I doubt that many of these roads would have been rebuilt because there simply wasn't a business case to justify the investment required. When you look at the current state of payments infrastructure in mature payments markets, you can make the same argument.

The US for example has ACH and Fedwire networks that were established in the 1970s. They work well for the original design, but of course there are limitations that are difficult to overcome and restrict the ability to address the future needs of consumers and corporations. While many countries are implementing near real time low value systems, speeding up the cycles of ACH (a batch based system), forces additional challenges on banks with long running batch processes on predominantly mainframe applications. Adoption of new data structures such as XML and ISO20022 for additional remittance information has been challenging to implement to say the least. As I say, these examples are challenges to modernization, but is it enough to create a compelling reason (and funding) to invest in true modernization?

So let's think about some recent drivers of change and modernization. In 2001, when cheques in the US were still cleared as paper items, they were transported around the country in planes. Those planes were grounded after 9/11, and so cheque clearing was effectively halted for days. This played a major part in driving the Check21 Act which enabled the exchange of cheque images and data in place of physical paper. In the UK, consumer advocacy groups played a large part in forcing the regulation that resulted in the Faster Payments initiative. Of course, there is also the SEPA initiative, again driven by regulation and without a clear business case for banks, and it seems that only mandating an end date for compliance will complete the long-running course. All of these initiatives have resulted in innovation being used to dramatically change the payments landscape, but it is doubtful that any of these initiatives would have happened without regulation.

I'm not a fan of more regulation - banks have enough on their plates - but I'll close by asking a provocative question. Payment systems are a complex but vital component of a country’s financial infrastructure. We have the technology, but is regulation what it takes to modernize for the next generation of payments processing?

TagsPaymentsSibos

Comments: (3)

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 21 September, 2010, 11:28

Yes would be my short answer to your provocative question! 

I happened to have the chance to get involved closely with UK Faster Payments when I was leading an FPS vendor consortium at a Top 5 UK bank. Need for regulatory compliance not only ensured adequate funding for the Faster Payments program itself, but also presented the opportunity to upgrade the entire payments landscape much of which was un-touched by modern technology since the late '80s.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Barry Kislingbury
Barry Kislingbury - ACI Worldwide - London | 21 September, 2010, 14:59

Based on our experience with UK Faster Payment (UKFP) and SEPA, both politically driven initiatives, UKFP had a deadline, SEPA still does not, UKFP was successful, SEPA is a lesson in how not to do things, so nothing will happen without regulation. 

The market will drive innovation, but if governments don’t get involved in how their countries finances work and balance banks, corporates and individuals needs we risk more financial turmoil. Remember, banks were originally set up to help other business and individuals drive economic growth, but they now make so much money they are an intrinsic and very powerful part of the economy in their own right. All countries have to do domestic and international clearing and settlement, but they all have different rules and standards which makes it complex and costly for banks, corporates and individuals. SEPA tries to get rid of these problems in Europe and looks like a good idea on paper, it seems to make sense for everyone yet without regulation it will never fulfil its potential.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 21 September, 2010, 16:36

My ringside seat at the said Top 5 UK bank included SEPA and TARGET2, not just FPS. Just as FPS had a deadline of 27 May 2008, there was a go-live deadline for introduction of SEPA, which was 24 Jan 2008 for the first product SEPA Credit Transfer.

It's somewhat difficult to compare FPS and SEPA to draw any meaningful conclusion w.r.t role of regulation since the scope of SEPA was somewhat more ambitious. Whereas SEPA is expected to replace existing domestic schemes in all EURO countries - and the lack of deadline for SEPA can only refer to the lack of sunset date for these existing domestic schemes - FPS supplements other existing domestic schemes in the UK viz. BACS and CHAPS. Neither is there an end-date for BACS and CHAPS nor is one envisaged.

 

 

 

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)

Latest posts from Colin

Big Data and Payments Drive Loyalty in Business Banking.

04 September 2013  |  5356 views  |  3 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

Big Data and Payments Drive Loyalty in Consumer Banking

28 August 2013  |  8920 views  |  2 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

India and the Race to Financial Inclusion

15 December 2010  |  4701 views  |  0 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPayments

Stimulus for Road Construction? How about Payments!

20 September 2010  |  3474 views  |  3 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsSibos

Payment Screening in the Cloud

20 August 2010  |  4836 views  |  1 comments | recomends Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsSibos

Colin's profile

job title Solutions Director Worldwide FSI
location Chicago
member since 2010
Summary profile See full profile »

Colin's expertise

Member since 2010
6 posts2 comments
What Colin reads
Colin writes about
PaymentsSibosInnovation
Colin's blog archive
2013 (2)2010 (4)

Who's commenting on Colin's posts