Blog article
See all stories »

An article relating to this blog post on Finextra:

Operational risk software market to hit $1.55bn by 2011 - study

According to Chartis Research's latest report on operational risk management systems, the worldwide financial services operational risk management (ORM) market will continue to grow, reaching a total...

See article

Investment bank bonus structures are an operational risk

This is one of the interesting topics that came up for debate at a risk event I attended yesterday organised by the CASS Business School in London and the Capco Institute.

The recent sub-prime and liquidity crisis has prompted many commentators to look at the role of investment banking remuneration and management structures in building what Fortune magazine and others have referred to as 'the Tinkerbell economy' (which was only viable as long as everyone continued to believe in it and make money from it). 

Robert Preston's BBC programme The Greed Game (and his blog post on the programme) sums this view up nicely and has generated lots of debate.

At yesterday's conference, it was pointed out that 90-95% of bonus pools at investment banks go to those senior people in the organisation who operate by assuming credit and market risk, which obviously generates healthy returns when things are going well, but also spectacular losses and global economic damage when their views of risk are skewed and things go wrong.

As a result, asked a member of the audience, isn't it difficult for the senior managers in charge of operational risk to get their views taken seriously and be involved in strategic decisions (as many suggest is an increasing need/trend)? This is particularly the case as the rewards when operational risk is managed effectively aren't always immediately apparent to those with an eye solely on quarterly profits.

Hans Geiger of the Swiss Banking Institute pointed out that the mechanisms of bonus schemes, if they are viewed as creating failures in people and processes that contribute to losses, could be seen as an operational risk. Therefore they could potentially be subject to regulatory scrutiny.

In fact, he said the Swiss Central Bank had recently made statements about investment banking bonus structures, the first time he is aware that a central body had done so.

If this is an idea that gains momentum (which I doubt, by the way), you can expect a lot of lobbying against it from those in the industry who benefit, or hope to, from the current reward structures. 


Comments: (1)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 10 April, 2008, 03:25Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Hi Elton,

From a credit ratings/ risk/ investor information point of view I wonder if the renumeration structure of the institution's chief risk takers might influence perceived risk?

Transparency would of course allow one to make up their own mind. 

It's all about trust. Lack of transparency helped get us into this mess, although it seems transparency might be argued as not quite being the best way to get us out of it.

Elton Cane

Elton Cane

Digital product delivery

News Corp Australia

Member since

16 Feb 2007



Blog posts




This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Trends in Financial Services

A community to discuss the future of financial services and any other interesting trends, strategies, ideas, views.

See all

Now hiring