30 November 2015

Barclays seeks dismissal of NY Attorney General's dark pool lawsuit

24 July 2014  |  5102 views  |  1 Barclays branch sign

Barclays has filed a motion seeking to throw out a lawsuit from the New York Attorney General accusing the bank of deceptively luring unwary investors to a dark pool that was actually being run for the benefit of predatory high-frequency traders.

The suit filed last month by crusading New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, claims that Barclays dramatically increased the market share of its dark pool by lying to clients about the level of protection they would receive from high-frequency trading firms.

The complaint alleges that the bank falsified marketing material and client reports to hide the extent and type of high frequency trading in its LX dark pool.

However, in its motion to dismiss it, Barclays says that the complaint "fails to identify any fraud-establishing no material misstatements, no identified victims, and no actual harm".

The bank says that Schneiderman's case ignores that LX customers are "highly sophisticated" traders and asset managers that rely on detailed execution data to decide where to execute their trades, "not on the glossy marketing brochures or quotes from magazine articles the NYAG cites".

In addition, Barclays says that Schneiderman does not even have the authority to bring the case because the Martin Act - on which the claims are predicated -is limited to actions for fraud in the purchase or sale of securities' while the allegations concern only the functioning of LX as an ATS.

Finally, the bank says that the complaint is wrong to seek damages and restitution for the people of the state of New York when it is not alleging that they suffered any harm.

Responding, Schneiderman's communications director Damien LaVera says: "We are confident that a judge will reject this motion and allow us to prove these disturbing allegations in Court."

Comments: (1)

Jim Wells - Wellspring Consulting International - Fort Lauderdale | 25 July, 2014, 16:29

How ironic that after US & UK financial regulators have allowed mega-banks to victimize customers with impunity for decades, Barclays now feels it is being victimized by an authority that seeks to hold it accountable for just one of its nefarious activities.  Jim Wells



Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board, sign up now.

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)

Related stories

26 June, 2014
09 June, 2014
06 June, 2014
18 March, 2014
25 September, 2013
07 June, 2013

Related company news

Your browser is unable to support Flash files.

Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
BBVA buys 29.5% stake in Atom for £45...
8181 views comments | 34 tweets | 42 linkedin
Former Barclays chief forecasts massive jo...
7396 views comments | 30 tweets | 35 linkedin
EPC publishes proposals for pan-European i...
7281 views comments | 34 tweets | 32 linkedin
WeChat launches mobile wallet in South Afr...
6409 views comments | 20 tweets | 16 linkedin
BBVA Bancomer first to roll out dynamic CV...
6003 views comments | 14 tweets | 21 linkedin

Featured job

to USD $130K base, double OTE
New York City, NY

Find your next job