10 February 2016

Liquidnet fined $2m for misusing dark pool subscriber data

09 June 2014  |  5242 views  |  1 STOP

Dark pool operator Liquidnet has agreed to pay $2 million to settle SEC charges that it improperly used confidential trading data from its subscribers.

Liquidnet violated its regulatory obligations and its own promises to its ATS subscribers for three years by giving a unit outside the dark pool operation access to the data, an SEC investigation found.

The firm promised its dark pool subscribers that it would keep their trading information confidential and allow them to trade with maximum anonymity and minimum information leakage.

Yet staffers at Liquidnet's equity capital markets (ECM) desk were given data that they then used during marketing presentations and communications to other customers and in two ATS sales tools.

For example, ECM employees would provide issuers with descriptions - including geographic locations, assets under management, and investment styles - of ATS subscribers who had recently indicated interest in buying or selling shares of issuers' stock.

ECM employees also used dark pool subscribers' trading data to advise issuers about which institutional investors they should meet during investor conferences and when clients should execute transactions in the ATS given the liquidity in the dark pool.

Daniel Hawke, chief, market abuse unit, enforcement division, SEC, says: "Liquidnet's subscribers trusted and believed that the firm was safeguarding their confidential information. Instead, the firm breached its assurances of confidentiality and anonymity to them by allowing its ECM employees to improperly access subscriber trading data."

Last week SEC chair Mary Jo White laid out her plans to improve oversight of dark pools, which now account for around 35% of US trading volume. She wants to increase the amount of information the SEC gets from these venues and is even considering making that data public to help investors track what their brokers are doing.

Comments: (1)

Neil Crammond - trader - london | 09 June, 2014, 11:42

question being that liquidnet were allowed to do this for 3 years ?


1 thumb up! 1 thumb up! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board, sign up now.

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)

Related stories

06 June, 2014
18 March, 2014
28 November, 2013
07 June, 2013
21 October, 2011
06 January, 2011
02 December, 2008

Related company news


Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
Fintech rising: Resistance is futile, says...
12213 views comments | 52 tweets | 45 linkedin
Digital transformation driving earnings at...
10910 views comments | 49 tweets | 45 linkedin
UK sets out open banking API framework
10900 views comments | 79 tweets | 75 linkedin
Visa opens up to developers
8958 views comments | 24 tweets | 41 linkedin
European mobile banking service Pocopay go...
7554 views comments | 24 tweets | 14 linkedin

Featured job

to $120K base, double OTE, benefits
New York City, NY or Boston, MA (USA)

Find your next job