23 October 2014

MEPs back caps on card fees across the EU

20 February 2014  |  4726 views  |  5 EU building, Brussels

The fees that banks charge retailers for processing shoppers' payments should be capped, Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee MEPs decided in a vote on Thursday.

Banks' card payment fees cost EU retailers over €10 billion each year, according to the European Commission figures.

In a statement, the Committee says: "These fees are not transparent and they differ between EU member states, where they are subject not to legislation but to decisions by national competition authorities."

In today's vote, MEPs backed the European Commission's proposal to cap the bank's fee at 0.3% of the transaction value.

For debit card transactions, the committee amended the proposed cap to seven euro cents, or 0.2% of the transaction value, whichever is the lower.

These caps would apply to both cross-border and domestic transactions in the EU and would take effect one year after the rules enter into force.

Under the new rules, retailers would also be free to choose which cards to accept, unless they are subject to the same interchange fee which, moreover, must comply with the cap set by these rules.

The rules will be put to vote by a full house at one of the upcoming parliamentary sessions.

Comments: (5)

John Shirey - aex Consulting Ltd. - Malahide | 21 February, 2014, 08:50

I wonder if the MEPS really understand that a cap on interchange will not reduce costs to consumers, but rather result in higher banking fees for consumers?  

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
A Finextra member | 21 February, 2014, 13:57

How can one defend interchange fees of 8%, for example on the MasterCard World card handed out by a red UK bank to their customers, that merchants are forced to accept under the 'honour all cards' rule and which costs a fuel retailer 10p a litre when their gross margin is 5p a litre. The merchant then jacks up the price 1p a litre for everyone hoping that only 10% of customers come with a premium brand card. Who then is subsidising all the benefits on the account that Lewis Hamilton and other multimillionaires are paid to advertise? It is other consumers. This is the first sensible thing to come out of Europe for years: one lot of consumers stop unwittingly subsidising another lot of consumers. For sure there will be ructions when it becomes apparent who has been underwriting whom and for what amounts.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Peter Robinson - Dixons Retail - London | 04 March, 2014, 11:58

There's no reason to suppose that a cap on interchange fees will result in higher banking fees. 

There are countries with a zero interchange fee who have a thriving card market, so it would be wrong to automatically assume higher fees will follow. If it does, then consumers can start to see which bank can offer the cheapest services and switch to them. It only takes a week to change bank accounts in the UK now. It'll enhance competition in the banking sector which can't be a bad thing and hopefully consumers will get a better deal out of the increased transparency it will bring.

Hopefully banks won't be worse off as card acceptance should actually increase as it becomes more affordable for the SME's to accept card payments - something that the high costs have previously put them off doing.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
John Shirey - aex Consulting Ltd. - Malahide | 04 March, 2014, 12:13

One basis of the proposed cap is to reduce consumer costs.

So the first question is if retailers do in fact get lower fees from Acquirers, will they pass that on to consumers?

Second point - there is basis to expect bank fees to go up.  

The Dubin Amendment in the US cost card Issuers circa US $7 BILLION.  No industry will just sit back and lose that much revenue.  As a result, US banks have raised and/or created new banking fees to recover that, no suprise.

Debates on Interchange are healthy.  My only point is to assume reduced Interchange will in fact reduce consumer costs is very unliklely.  

To me, a like analogy is that if a retailers rent goes down, do they pass that reduction on to consumers?

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Peter Robinson - Dixons Retail - London | 04 March, 2014, 13:06

I think you're making the wrong analogy and don't fully appreciate exactly how competitive the retail sector is.

The text below is an extract from a letter signed by the CEO's of 13 of the UK's largest retailers and Trade Associations including M&S; Sainsbury's; Asda, Morisons, Dixons, Boots; WH Smith and The British Independent Retail Association which represents smaller businesses. It was released by the British Retail Consortium on 16th December last year.

The market in which we operate is highly competitive. We compete on price and value every day and put our customers at the heart of everything we do. Any savings in a reduction in card interchange fees will create capital to enable a range of investments to be made such as, investing in new store designs; improving customer service propositions; extending the range of products available; investing in technology to improve the customer shopping experience (multichannel, mobile); expanding our commercial footprint through new stores; and crucially, enabling small businesses to compete more effectively.

In effect, ALL consumers will benefit including those that choose to pay be cash.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board, sign up now.

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)

Related stories

23 September, 2013
29 July, 2013
24 July, 2013
20 November, 2012
12 October, 2012
31 July, 2012
24 May, 2012
11 July, 2011
08 December, 2010

Related company news

 

Featured job

Basic £130-140K Variable £70-90K
London (preferred) or Paris

Find your next job