12 February 2016

Verizon refusing to support Google Wallet - report

06 December 2011  |  8164 views  |  2 s dish

Verizon Wireless has demanded that Google disable its mobile wallet app in the forthcoming release of the latest Galaxy Nexus smartphone from Samsung.

Verizon - the number one carrier in the US - is a member of the Isis consortium, which is planning to launch its own mobile wallet service next year.

Verizon's refusal to distribute the rival Google app was confirmed by a Google spokesperson who told Reuters: "Verizon asked us not to include this functionality in the product."

Verizon cites nebulous security concerns as its principal objection to the Google application, with the clear subtext that carrier wants to retain control of the secure element in the NFC chip - and therefore the customer.

So far Sprint - a non-Isis consortium member - is the only US carrier to support Google on Nexus smartphones.

It remains to be seen if the other members of the Isis triumvirate, AT&T and T-Mobile, decide to follow Verizon's lead. Such a course of action may be risky, invoking anti-trust concerns.

Comments: (2)

David Abbott
David Abbott - Fiserv - London | 07 December, 2011, 16:19

If a verizon customers want a google wallet that much, surely they can just port their number to Sprint and get one there? Thats the risk Verizon takes surely?  If Google/Sprint think the wallet is a major asset they should be welcoming the opportunity to grab market share

Google may have a case for anti trust or restrictive trade practices - but Verizon are not a monopoly last time I looked?  

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 08 December, 2011, 12:20

If banks have to take the permission of Apple and Google to get mobile banking apps on to their own customers' smartphones, it's only fair that Google should face a similar situation with Verizon and other MNOs with its Google Wallet app. Either both practices invoke antitrust concerns or neither does.   

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Finextra news in your inbox

For Finextra's free daily newsletter, breaking news flashes and weekly jobs board, sign up now.

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)

Related stories

17 November, 2011
19 October, 2011
18 October, 2011
12 October, 2011
19 September, 2011
25 August, 2011
01 August, 2011
13 July, 2011
23 June, 2011
13 June, 2011
26 May, 2011
05 April, 2011
16 November, 2010
21 June, 2007

Related company news


Top topics

Most viewed Most shared
UK sets out open banking API frameworkUK sets out open banking API framework
14929 views comments | 100 tweets | 89 linkedin
Deutsche Bank calls for co-operation with fintech firms on B2B servicesDeutsche Bank calls for co-operation with...
8093 views comments | 28 tweets | 30 linkedin
How to accelerate your fintech startupHow to accelerate your fintech startup
7683 views comments | 33 tweets | 9 linkedin
Is Paym a failure?Is Paym a failure?
6508 views 16 comments | 22 tweets | 16 linkedin
Visa issues API to offer consumer control over card transactionsVisa issues API to offer consumer control...
6005 views comments | 17 tweets | 28 linkedin

Featured job

£100,000 basic, £180,000 OTE + Benefits

Find your next job