02 August 2014

Brits happy with online banking; mobile uptake slow, social media a no-no

25 May 2011  |  13044 views  |  8 keyboard

Customer satisfaction with online banking in the UK is high, far outstripping other channels such as branches, ATMs, call centres and mobiles, according to a survey from ForeSee Results.

The poll of around 1000 customers at RBS, Lloyds, Barclays, HSBC and Santander shows an aggregate satisfaction score for online banking of 80 out of 100. There is little difference between the five, with a range of just 77 to 82.

When asked which channel they are most satisfied with, 70% choose online, compared to 17% for the branch, 10% cash machines, two per cent call centres and one per cent for mobile banking.

The poor support for mobile is partly accounted for by a lack of awareness - only 15% know of apps or mobile sites for their bank. Just 10% of respondents are using their mobile phone to bank, and less than one per cent have actually used an app.

There is even less curiosity about the much-hyped social media sphere, with 97% of respondents saying they have no interest in friending, following or liking their banks on sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

In fact, the survey reveals some old fashioned preferences, with 42% wanting their banks to use the post to contact them, compared to 38% who want e-mail, 11% the Web site and three per cent text messages or mobile alerts.

The satisfaction with Internet banking is good news for providers, says ForeSee Results CEO Larry Freed, because happy customers are 63% more likely to continue to use the Web site instead of other, costlier channels, 39% more likely to purchase additional services and 76% more likely to recommend the bank.

"For online banking the Web site is a critical touch point, so it's essential that they master that art of customer satisfaction and invest their time and energy into measuring the different elements of customers' online experience," says Freed.

Comments: (8)

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 25 May, 2011, 12:34

This was experienced already at an early stage of online banking - back in the 80s and early 90s in Finland - before the Internet version. What occured was extraordinary jumps in customer satisfaction and when we looked into them it coincided with taking e-banking into use.

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 27 May, 2011, 13:03

Props to banks. By placing the findings of this survey in the context of a few recently released reports (World Retail Banking Report 2011 and Deutsche Bank Social Media Report), it appears that their channel strategy is working: 

  1. Customers say online banking is one of the two most important channels for them (branch being the other). This survey finds customer satisfaction to be high on online banking.
  2. Banks have a long way to go to catch up on mobile, but since their customers don't accord high importance to this channel, banks can take their time to set the right priorities for their mobile strategy. With time, they might find Mobile RDC to be the first mobile payments killer app!  
  3. Customers say they're not too interested in connecting with their FIs over social media. Therefore, budget-starved banks can afford to hold on to their social media plans until customer preferences change. For now, as a representative customer, I'd be more than happy if banks replied to my letters / emails within a reasonable time - realtime tweets and Facebook updates are entirely optional!

However, there seems to be room for improvement in the branch channel. I hope banks do something about this instead of shutting down their branches en masse!

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 27 May, 2011, 14:11

Customers pay every cent of the costs banks have - and it is especially expensive and not very sensemaking to have too many big branches designed for transaction services in countries where online banking has taken off.

 

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 27 May, 2011, 15:49

I'm not so sure how many customers really believe that every penny they save for the bank comes back to them - I for one don't. According to WRBR-2011 report, it's in a country like USA where online banking is quite mature that customers find the branch to be the most important channel. So, I don't believe that cost or channel capability matter so much to customers while judging their banks' multichannel offerings. 

What does matter - and this is what banks need to keep in mind while allocating their multichannel dollars - is customers' perception that "the branch and internet (have) different strengths". According to the report, customers all over the world believe "The internet excels in information gathering, transacting, and looking up account status ... The branch is the preferred channel for solving problems, indicating the value of having a human touch in certain situations." 

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 29 May, 2011, 20:41

I am saying that customers pay every cent of any service providers cost - not that they are getting back every saved cent. But for sure if cents are not saved there is nothing to give back. Our experience in Finland - where the combined costs of banks were cut in half - much due to branch closures enabled by e-banking - was that most of the costs saving went back to customers in fierce price competition. The other potential direction - the shareholders - got a much smaller slice.

 

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 29 May, 2011, 20:43

Branches are important as sales offices - but we should by now try harder to get away from manual transactions of all sorts - especially cheques and cash.

Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune | 30 May, 2011, 10:44

@Bo H: With heavy competition in banking, banks have to sell as much as other industries do. "Branch as a sales office" is an innovative concept. Banks can shift as many transactions to e-channels as they like. As long as such shifts are aligned with the preference of a majority of their customers - rather than based upon internal costs or perceived channel capability - they won't face any risk of customer dissatisfaction.   

Bo Harald - ZEF and Real Time Economy Program - Esbo | 30 May, 2011, 15:19

Starting to use onlinebanking is usually leading to a jump in customer satisfaction - and lower costs for the bank - and thus for customers taken together if competition is working. This does not mean that e-banking should not be charged for - but less than the manual alternatives.

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Related blogs

Create a blog about this story (membership required)

Related stories

20 May, 2011
07 April, 2011
25 March, 2011
09 March, 2011
16 February, 2011
19 October, 2010
01 October, 2010
13 May, 2010
27 April, 2010

Related company news

 

Featured job

to $120k base ($250k OTE including commission), be...
Boston, MA (USA)

Find your next job