08 February 2016

44975

Retired Member

1,368Posts 4,724,260Views 1,609Comments

Staying local in a global world

19 May 2014  |  1774 views  |  0

With the continuous increase in regulatory oversight, many market participants raised concerns about extraterritoriality and the risks to cross-border trading early on. Despite the efforts of regulators around the globe to push equivalence and reciprocity arrangements, the risk of ‘Balkanisation’ of markets still seems very real. Considering the CME is set to open its European exchange, and GFI has stated recently that it sees no demand for a US approved European MTF, there seems to be an awful lot of focus on building parallel infrastructure in different jurisdictions. But there are also opposing signs, indicating a trend towards a more closely integrated financial world; ICAP is launching a UK based SEF, and Singapore’s UOB is the first Asian bank to connect directly to Eurex Clearing. Whether or not you believe in ‘Balkanisation’, this suggests that while regulatory equivalence and reciprocity might be necessary, these measures alone are not sufficient for global trading to flourish. More than ever, firms need access to the right infrastructure to manage regionally specific regulations and the footprint to access global trading opportunities.

TagsTrade executionRisk & regulation

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from

Retired's profile

job title
location
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Retired's expertise

What Retired reads
Retired writes about

Who's commenting on Retired's posts

Steve Patel
Aparty Behera
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Karim Maalouf
Brendan Burge
Konstantin Rabin
Paul Zaman
Astrid Mitchell
Balasubramaniam GD
Graham Seel
Bjorn Soland
Miloslav Hoschek