31 October 2014

Stuart Clark

Stuart Clark - Impendium Systems

272 | posts 363,018 | views 0 | comments

Financial Services Regulation

This network is for financial professionals interested in staying up to date on financial services regulation happening anywhere in the world. CFOs, bankers, fund managers, treasurers welcome.

Law Society sets out views on EMIR reporting requirements

20 March 2014  |  661 views  |  0

The City of London Law Society (CLLS) regulatory law committee has published a memorandum on the potential legal uncertainties which may arise as to the application of the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) – and specifically its reporting requirements - to ordinary corporate transactions and arrangements (e.g. between companies and their shareholders, when capital raising, with share scheme arrangements for employees).

The memorandum sets out the implications of the widely drawn definition of a derivative under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) which is used in EMIR to define the application of its provisions. The memorandum sets out the view that there should be a distinction drawn between OTC derivatives traded between corporate entities and financial counterparties for speculative and hedging purposes (in respect of which there is a discernable "market") and those private arrangements entered into by companies with their employees and shareholders or with other non-financial companies, as part of ordinary corporate transactional business and for very different purposes.

The memorandum sets out why the CLLS considers that it was not the regulators' intention to capture such transactions and advocates extending the Financial Services Authority's approach in MiFID to adopt a "dominant characteristic" test, applying this to corporate transactions before conducting a technical analysis of whether a component of the transactions is or is not a derivative for the purposes of MiFID and therefore reportable under EMIR.

8 examples of the application of this to the non-financial counterparty corporate sector are provided to give clear and proportionate guidance so that unnecessary and counterproductive confusion is not created and that reports provided focus on speculative and risk management instruments which are reportable.

Related link:

http://www.citysolicitors.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=152&Itemid=469%20

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Stuart

FSB to publish report on sharing derivative data

08 May 2014  |  1387 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

BCBS publishes capital standard for bank exposures to CCPs

07 May 2014  |  3432 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

EIOPA chair calls for extended powers of inquiry

06 May 2014  |  745 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

EC consults on the definition of FX financial instruments

02 May 2014  |  1287 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation

ESAs issue RTS for non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives

01 May 2014  |  1038 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinancial Services Regulation
name

Stuart Clark

job title

Product Development Director

company name

Impendium Systems

member since

2012

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
Co-founded Impendium in 2006. Previously head of Client Services for Deutsche Banks top 100 cust...

Stuart's expertise

What Stuart reads
Stuart writes about

Who is commenting on Stuart's posts

Horst Simon