27 November 2015


Alexander Peschkoff - TEDIPAY

114Posts 449,189Views 523Comments

Innovation in Financial Services

A discussion of trends in innovation management within financial institutions, and the key processes, technology and cultural shifts driving innovation.

There is a stranger in your car

10 January 2014  |  2794 views  |  1

When you are on a crowded bus, you don't know who is standing next to you and what that person is up to. There are a lot of weird and obsessed people out there...

Now, imagine your own car - what would you feel if after a couple of hours on a motorway, driving at high speed, you turned around and saw a complete stranger in the backseat...

That's exactly where "software-only" solutions - such as HCE or app-based mobile payments - lead us to.

It was hard to miss the news re Target's security breach, including today's "update" of the damage to 70m cards. Although the (forensic) jury is still out, several credible sources suggest that the breach occurred on the terminal OS level. That is the same OS which was considered mega-safe and which was designed to allow access to/from the authorized parties only.

Why did the Target breach took everyone by (huge) surprise? It's all about zero-day attack - a "black swan" event that brings the proverbial 20/20 hindsight.

The industry keeps forgetting that any software is just that - a piece of code. Which can be manipulated and exploited with a malicious intent that would strike out of the blue.

How many "Target" situations do we need to live through to grasp the difference between secure and "almost safe"?.. The latter is like being "almost pregnant" - you either are or you aren't, there is no middle ground.

TagsSecurityMobile & online

Comments: (1)

A Finextra member | 13 January, 2014, 19:11

I agree 100% Alex. Payment industry players are too complacent in believing themselves and convincing others that their components and systems are very secure and then these things happen right under their noses. POS terminal is one classic example ... despite of the assurances it gets hacked inevitably

I firmly believe that the card Issuers should not trust POS devices nor even Acquirer systems ... thay must ensure that the cardholder data is ONLY KNOWN to their end systems along the payment rails (i.e. EMV or contactless compliant chip application of course and the Issuer Host). Nothing in between should be allowed to see the real PAN data, but the data that looks and feels like PAN, so that the Merchant and Acquirers systems still continue to function normally.

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Alexander

Fancy a quickie?

21 November 2015  |  1108 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsInnovationStart upsGroupInnovation in Financial Services

You must be kidding me

14 November 2015  |  1173 views  |  1  |  Recommends 1 TagsInnovationStart upsGroupInnovation in Financial Services

Apple Pay and TfL tidbits

20 July 2015  |  1782 views  |  1  |  Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlinePaymentsGroupInnovation in Financial Services

Alexander's profile

job title CEO
location London
member since 2012
Summary profile See full profile »
I am the co-founder and CEO of TEDIPAY, the company that is bringing to the market a game-changing platform for secure mobile transactions.

Alexander's expertise

What Alexander reads
Alexander writes about

Who's commenting on Alexander's posts

Pierre Galeon
Ketharaman Swaminathan
Andrew Rothwell
Martin cox
Sunil Gokani
Matt Scott
Dave Sanderson
Robert Avery
Lu Zurawski
Chetan Ghadge
Paul Love