19 April 2014

Callum Godwin

Callum Godwin - CMS Payments Intelligence

2 | posts 4,680 | views 3 | comments

What does US interchange ruling mean for retailers?

16 December 2013  |  2682 views  |  1

The US District Court’s ruling to accept a one-off settlement from Visa and MasterCard to merchants over credit card interchange fee overcharges in the United States means that no interchange cap has been proposed.

Therefore, CMSpi  are concerned that this decision could enable further credit card interchange rate increases to compensate for reduced debit card interchange income following the implementation of the Durbin Amendment in 2011.

Credit card interchange fees in the US, at more than 2% of the transaction value, are amongst the highest in the Western world and are around double what retailers are charged in Europe. The fees totalled nearly $45bn across all credit cards in the US in 2012. 

Using the European Commission endorsed Tourist Test interchange rate cap of 0.3% for credit card transactions as a basic indicator (which itself has been criticised for being too high), interchange payments on the approximately $2.25tn of annual credit payment volume in the US should be $6.75bn per annum – a reduction of over $35bn on current charges. We should note that although we would not expect these fees to be as low in the US as they are in Europe due to the higher usage of unsecure signature card transactions, we can still identify that a total settlement of $7.25bn is completely insufficient in compensating merchants for years of overcharges. 

Many of the largest US retailers (accounting for around 25% of all credit card transaction volume between them) have opted out of the pay-out, and it’s not difficult to see why; the benefits of successful litigation greatly exceed the current compensation offer, and make the convenience of a quick one-off fee a very undesirable option. Accepting the offer also eliminates retailers’ ability to fight interchange increases in the future. 

Considering all of these facts, we can see why the American Bankers Association are so keen to escape with such a meagre punishment. It is very easy for anyone to “put this matter behind” them when the outcome suits them so well. We expect this announcement to initiate a lengthy legal battle between merchants and card network providers. 

Please contact me if you have any questions or views on the above.

TagsCardsRisk & regulation

Comments: (1)

Alexander Peschkoff - TEDIPAY - London | 17 December, 2013, 00:30 "Years of overcharging"... Should oil companies sue all the motorists for years of undercharging (i.e. the price of oil now being higher than back then)?.. Nobody forced the merchant to accept cards, it was their own grown-up decision. Why whine now? After all, during those "years of overcharging", card networks built a highly reliable and globally ubiquitous solution, well before mobile telecom - let alone the Internet - became mainstream (and when a minute of trans-Atlantic call cost almost $10...) That's even before we consider that consumer didn't see a single penny from Durbin...
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Callum

What does US interchange ruling mean for retailers?

16 December 2013  |  2682 views  |  1  |  Recommends 1 TagsCardsRisk & regulation

Will Retailers be forced to pay for Polymer Notes?

26 November 2013  |  1999 views  |  0  |  Recommends 4 TagsPaymentsRisk & regulation
name

Callum Godwin

job title

Research Analyst

company name

CMS Payments Intelligence

member since

2013

location

Manchester

Summary profile See full profile »
Callum joined CMSpi following a degree in Economics from the University of Bath and a years exper...

Callum's expertise

What Callum reads
Callum writes about

Who is commenting on Callum's posts

Alexander Peschkoff