Blog article
See all stories ยป

Post Trade Services: why the buy side needs to commit

With the multitude of regulation being debated or approved for implementation, the financial sector must navigate myriad new rules. Post-trade operations, typically an area of activity driven by the sell side, though more recently also by larger buy side firms, are also challenged by the slate of new regulatory or market events, whether that be EMIR, Dodd Frank, CSD-R or T2S.

With punitive fail costs, the requirement to evidence electronic confirmation or affirmation, financial sanctions, collateral and liquidity concerns, trade reporting, stock lending requirements, fines and bad press all likely consequences of poor operational processes, neither buy nor sell side can afford to ignore the new, planned or live market changes.

It is also interesting that the debate around shortened settlement cycles in Europe have shifted from whether they are a good idea, to one of how to implement and migrate, but there still seems to be challenges with who takes the lead on this.

Many large sell side firms are looking to extend their operational processes to further reach their total trade population, via new or existing market solutions. Their belief is that by matching more of their trades earlier in the lifecycle they can reduce downstream issues or impacts, be that the potential for failure, correct reporting or reduction of liquidity issues.

But how well set is the industry today to meet these challenges? With recent reports suggesting that the planned regulation will add costs to already pressured operational budgets, at a time of diminishing return on equity, is this asking too much of the industry? Will the planned regulations actually have the desired effect of lessening likelihood of default, increasing operational resiliency and giving regulators worldwide more oversight of banking activities?

One thing that seems certain is that to ensure enough is being done across the industry, the buy side needs to lead more industry change to ensure total community participation. With much of the regulation becoming law, these challenges will not be something any trading counterparty can avoid.

6665

Comments: (4)

Gary Wright
Gary Wright 13 May, 2013, 11:59Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Best hope i have seen for decades is LEI and all the business operational benefits it can bring. The buy side need to engage fast in LEI as its a win win in terms of both sell and buy side benefits. How many people know of LEI and its broad benefits? How many FS have instigated a LEI implementation? Not as many as should i guess and they are missing a chance 

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 13 May, 2013, 16:53Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Hi Gary,

Re LEI, is it not also a case of making sure you have the correct data, and aggregation at source? A case of getting fundamentals right if you will?

Agree, a lead needs to be taken, much like the unaffirmed population of trades, from the industry as a whole..

Thanks for taking the time to read this and comment.

Paul

Gary Wright
Gary Wright 13 May, 2013, 17:15Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Hi Paul

Its a fundemental that first you have the correct counterparty/investor/account code and why LEI is so important. Other matching data should then be tied to the relevant LEI. The big issue is SSIs and getting a standard. Apart from OMGEO there is no other vendor supplying real competition or standards. Even with competition SSIs are really a utility function and does not really provide a industry complete solution. Maybe the LEI structure set up by the FSB should go onto SSIs?

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 14 May, 2013, 09:24Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Lots of talk re SSI and it being a Utility Service at the moment in the Industry, definitely a notion we would support.

Of course, that would need to be with a more standardised way of SSI population in that Utility for it to have fundamental impact and reduction of SSI exceptions.

If this then leads to a requirement of LEI matching, then it is something that should be led by the community.

At this stage simply improving the unaffirmed population from 40-60% to something much better in preparation for market change, regulation or simply from a cost and efficiency perspective, would be a positive move for the industry..

Blog group founder

Member since

0

Location

0

More from member

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Post-Trade Forum

The Post Trade Forum's aim is to propagate debate and discussion between senior practitioners in Post Trade Operations in the global securities market; to bring about increased awareness and knowledge across both buy-side and sell-side financial institutions in financial products and be a focal point for firms and practitioners to air views.


See all

Now hiring