27 November 2015

Curtis Nash

Curtis Nash - Cognia

11Posts 39,772Views 1Comments

Financial Services Regulation

This network is for financial professionals interested in staying up to date on financial services regulation happening anywhere in the world. CFOs, bankers, fund managers, treasurers welcome.

Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

22 September 2011  |  4439 views  |  0

Speaking to prospects and customers about their experiences in trialing and using different mobile-recording systems, I’m surprised by some of the myths that I hear.

If you’ve still not implemented a mobile recording system to meet the Financial Service Authority’s 14 November deadline for the recording of mobile calls, then here’s a few debunked:

Myth 1: SIM-based solutions are easier to set up and manage than app-based systems
Not the case. SIM-based mobile-recording solutions require new mobile contracts, manual installation of new SIMs, unlocked phones and often porting of numbers.

In contrast, well developed applications can be installed, activated and deactivated remotely en masse, and software updates implemented automatically.

Myth 2: Low or no license or subscription means low-cost
Treat mobile recording like any other technology purchase. Look at the total cost of ownership: call charges—especially when roaming— and any other infrastructure, implementation or storage costs. One disgruntled SIM-based mobile recording user reported that their monthly charges during a trial were over £500. Conference-call based and store-and-forward solutions will significantly increase call charges.

Myth 3: You can meet the regulations by blocking the use of mobiles.
Technically you can. In practice, however, ask yourself this: what proportion of your traders still use mobiles even though you no doubt already ban their use for relevant conversations? The more you restrict communication options the more likely some will find uncontrolled ways to do their job.

Myth 4: SIM-based mobile recording offers better user experience than app-based products
Never assume this about any solution—app or SIM-based. Routing calls through central recording infrastructure is no trivial matter, whether its network-controlled or application-managed. It may mean changing your base network if you go the SIM approach and could also impact your SLAs.

Make sure your traders try before you buy. Especially if you are contemplating using a conference call-based or a store-and-forward product.

Myth 5: SIM solutions are the future
Today’s first-generation SIM solutions give us a glimpse of the strengths, flaws and limitations of pure network-controlled systems. Are we entering an app-less world? In short, no. This is something that we’ll delve deeper into, in a future blog.


Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Curtis

Open letter to regulators in the wake of the Gensler legacy.

16 January 2014  |  1787 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationInnovation

Speech analytics - getting past the hype

28 May 2013  |  2560 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationRetail banking

US tax payers pay for SEC phone-recording intransigence

21 May 2012  |  2837 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationGroupFinancial Services Regulation

Interview with FSA sets record straight on mobile recording

03 October 2011  |  3679 views  |  0  |  Recommends 1 TagsSecurityGroupFinancial Services Regulation

The world's first hapless mobile call recording solution

28 September 2011  |  3057 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsGroupFinancial Services Regulation

Curtis's profile

job title CEO
location London
member since 2011
Summary profile See full profile »
Founder and CEO of Cognia (formerly Compliant Phones), a provider of global communications services for compliance, risk and productivity.

Curtis's expertise

What Curtis reads
Curtis writes about
Curtis's blog archive
2014 (1)2013 (1)2012 (1)2011 (8)

Who's commenting on Curtis's posts