23 April 2014

Graham

Graham Underwood - GFT

14 | posts 50,919 | views 4 | comments

Banking Architecture

A community for discussing the latest happenings in banking IT. Credit Crunch impacting Risk Systems overall, revamp of mortgage backed securities, payment transformations, include business, technology, data and systems architecture capturing IT trends, 'what to dos?' concerning design of systems.

Start it and the users will come.

10 September 2010  |  4470 views  |  0

The last few years have seen many changes in the banking world, but we’ve recently experienced a new effect of the financial crisis; starting a project before the user community is in place. Not only did this regulatory-driven project have continuously changing requirements and parameters, but the extreme circumstances meant that various aspects of the programme were running in parallel and to a delivery schedule with zero contingency (of course).

 

Traditionally, users define the business requirements at the outset and the project team works through the four stage process, analysis, design, build and test, before returning the new system to the users with complete knowledge transfer.  In this case, the critical state of affairs caused by the banking crisis created a project where the requirements were in a continuous state of change or refinement and design, development and testing were all happening in parallel. In the end the team had to devise a closed scope design in order to enable an iterative approach to development and make some progress.

 

When the user community were eventually hired, the project moved into a concurrent testing phase, which resulted in a raft of change requests. The advantage of the team’s parallel, iterative and integrated approach however, was to enable continuous feedback between the sub-teams during analysis and design. Whilst unorthodox, and we wouldn’t usually set out to do it this way, it did mean that we were conducting user acceptance testing and resolving issues in real time.

 

All in all, this was a particularly demanding project for the combined client and outsourced team. I wouldn’t choose to start a project without users; I wouldn’t choose to have such an extremely challenging deadline, but we have learnt that it’s possible. An unexpected effect of the financial crisis is that we developed a new way of working.

 

Graham Underwood, Managing Director, GFT UK.

 

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Graham

Does ambition exceeding funding in Finance IT?

17 January 2011  |  4113 views  |  0  |  Recommends 1 GroupInnovation in Financial Services

Creating a profitable app?

05 November 2010  |  4709 views  |  1  |  Recommends 0 TagsOnline bankingGroupInnovation in Financial Services

iPad - just a new device, or a new way of doing business?

22 September 2010  |  5811 views  |  1  |  Recommends 0 GroupInnovation in Financial Services

Start it and the users will come.

10 September 2010  |  4470 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 GroupBanking Architecture

Can Bold Innovation Save Banking?

03 February 2010  |  4257 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsOnline bankingGroupInnovation in Financial Services
name

Graham Underwood

job title

Managing Director

company name

GFT

member since

2008

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
Managing Director, IT services company specialising in the financial services sector.

Graham's expertise

What Graham reads
Graham writes about

Who is commenting on Graham's posts