22 September 2014

Geoff Harries

Geoff Harries - Fiserv

9 | posts 49,787 | views 0 | comments

Asia Financial Services.

Covering all aspects of financial services in Asia from banking in China to algo trading in Japan.

Buy-side Perspective: Corporate Actions Still a Priority?

06 October 2009  |  5591 views  |  0

With an increasing pressure on revenue and margins, corporate action losses are becoming more difficult to absorb within the business. The risk profile has not changed, but the ability to absorb these losses is now substantially different. It should therefore be a high priority for 2009/2010.

 

Standardisation and automation is key to preventing losses from missed deadlines or misinterpreted data. Since the capture and interpretation of time sensitive information is critical to the process, automation lies at the centre of an organisation’s ability to mitigate risk.

 

There are, however, two distinct processes that need to be considered together to ensure effectiveness:

-       Automating the process of data capture, cleansing and validation

-       Automating to reduce market risk between internal processing and instructions

 

The distinction has to be made between automation and straight-through-processing (STP). There are very few parts of a corporate actions life-cycle that lend themselves to STP, there are however critical stages that will yield significant benefits through automation.

 

If we look at XBRL tagging, there will always be points where manual intervention is required. By having issuer information referenced at the point of need would be a significant innovation. However, we need to look at adoption of the basic messages to see how this added value will get incorporated into the process. While XBRL is at its genesis for inclusion in corporate actions processing, we are probably 2-3 years away from seeing any impact that is widely adopted, especially when the standard it is interoperable with has not yet been embraced by operations today.

 

Corporate actions automation is still in the adoption phase. We need to consider how to achieve broader adoption in the asset management community. In-bound message processing capabilities are essential to remove the need to rely on fax machines. There must be levels of sophistication to manage complex validation, and intelligently deal with narrative when it occurs within a structured message.

 

I agree with the point made by Drew Douglas at HSBC (see article). Co-existence of standards not only increases cost, but additionally leads to inactivity since investment in today’s standard may be viewed as sunk cost. Waiting for full coverage on a new standard may be seen as preferable, history however shows that adoption is often slow, and it is better to take advantage of solutions today, in order to reap the business benefit, than to wait for the promises of future innovation.   

 

 

TagsPost-trade & opsSibos

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Geoff

Buy-side Perspective: Corporate Actions Still a Priority?

06 October 2009  |  5591 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

Corporate Actions: Faxes Working Overtime

01 October 2009  |  5434 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

OTC Lifecycle automation increases for the buy side

31 July 2009  |  5310 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

Prevent Revenue Leakage By Plugging the Gaps Now

30 June 2009  |  5112 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

OTC lifecycle control begins internally with operations

11 June 2009  |  3971 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.
name

Geoff Harries

job title

VP Product Strategy

company name

Fiserv

member since

2008

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
VP, Product Strategy. Responsible for product strategy, product management and product marketing...

Geoff's expertise

What Geoff reads
Geoff writes about
Geoff's blog archive
2009 (8)2008 (1)

Who is commenting on Geoff's posts