31 October 2014

Falling off a Blog

Hugh Cumberland - Colt

11 | posts 35,344 | views 4 | comments

Finexpo

This community space has been established to keep participants up-to-date with Finexpo conference and exhibition news, and as a forum for discussion of the key challenges facing the capital markets industry

Where were the shareholders?

09 March 2009  |  3770 views  |  2

Who’s to blame for the destruction of bank shareholder equity?

Those nasty bankers, with their eye-watering bonus plans?

The regulators, who didn’t spot the bubble when it was blocking out the whole sky?

Those self-serving politicians who oversee the regulators and maintain the health of the economic system that the bankers feed in?

What about the shareholders? The executive of any body corporate is answerable to the shareholders on most matters, especially shareholder value.

So, where were shareholders when shareholders’ equity was being destroyed? The truth is that most shareholders are too small to have a voice. But we do have guardian angels looking over our investments for us. Our plan sponsors. Our fund managers.

We pay them. So what did they do to preserve our capital, growth and income?

They will no doubt argue that they were entitled to rely on the regulators to ensure that our investments were protected.

That’s a bit like leaving your car unlocked outside your house, with the keys in the ignition and trusting that the police will stop it from being stolen.

Hugh Cumberland

Product Strategy Director, BT GFS

TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & ops

Comments: (2)

David Hough - GreenKite Consulting - manchester | 09 March, 2009, 13:14

 

In  investing ,what goes up must come down, the bubble burst and it always will at some point, and it will hurt.

 

http://ethicaltreasurer.blogspot.com/

 

 

 

 

 

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Mary Freeman - Simplify IT Limited - London | 13 March, 2009, 13:59

Equally, why are they not applying the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 to claim fiduciary recompence from the directors who failed to consider the long term impact of their decisions on success the company?

Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 thumb ups! (Log in to thumb up)
Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Hugh

Formula for Success?

05 May 2009  |  4117 views  |  0  |  Recommends 1 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsGroupFinexpo

The Thundering Herd

07 April 2009  |  7097 views  |  1  |  Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsGroupFinexpo

I am an Engineer!

13 March 2009  |  3790 views  |  1  |  Recommends 0 GroupFinexpo

Giant ponzi scheme uncovered

12 March 2009  |  4152 views  |  2  |  Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsGroupFinexpo

Where were the shareholders?

09 March 2009  |  3770 views  |  2  |  Recommends 0 TagsRisk & regulationPost-trade & opsGroupFinexpo
name

Hugh Cumberland

job title

Financial Services Solution Manager

company name

Colt

member since

2009

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
Solution Management for Financial Services including ultra-low latency, SWIFTNet, Proximity, Targ...

Hugh's expertise

What Hugh reads
Hugh writes about
Hugh's blog archive
2009 (11)

Who is commenting on Hugh's posts