25 April 2014

Geoff Harries

Geoff Harries - Fiserv

9 | posts 49,259 | views 0 | comments

Trends in Financial Services

A community to discuss the future of financial services and any other interesting trends, strategies, ideas, views.

Industry pressure drives required changes in OTC processing

04 March 2009  |  5953 views  |  0

In an FT article a few days back, Jay Hooley of State Street raised some concerns around the impact of OTC volumes on legacy systems. In my experience many firms today have developed limited capabilities for automating the OTC volume within their business.  Where it does exist it is often in silos, and does not cover the full life-cycle of the contract. At the same time, sophisticated solutions exist today that can process multi-asset class transactions in one central system. The buy-side, in fact, has a greater operational requirement to centralise middle and back-office functions across asset classes for confirmation and settlement processes to increase operational efficiency and reduce risk, and we are seeing those projects being delivered today

 

However, mounting pressure from the Fed, as outlined in their most recent letter in October 2008, is forcing all industry participants to change the way they process OTC derivatives. Furthermore, with the Fed now requiring 85% of electronic trades to be processed on T+0 and 94% of confirmations to be processed without modification, including novations, the use of existing silo based platforms, or even manually intensive operational procedures, is no longer viable.

 

This increasing pressure is welcomed in some quarters as it will require firms to not only consider new IT infrastructure and operational procedures, but also a change of mindset in the way confirmations are processed. Only with this new focus can firms hope to reduce the number of paper trades through the use of electronic platforms, eliminate material backlogs and streamline the OTC trade lifecycle to cope with confirmations as well as terminations and novations. 

 

This pressure is actively forcing firms to seek to identify the necessary steps to work towards implementing an operational framework capable of providing full post-trade event management support, while enabling product innovation and execution of investment.

TagsPost-trade & opsSibos

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Geoff

Buy-side Perspective: Corporate Actions Still a Priority?

06 October 2009  |  5537 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

Corporate Actions: Faxes Working Overtime

01 October 2009  |  5397 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

OTC Lifecycle automation increases for the buy side

31 July 2009  |  5270 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

Prevent Revenue Leakage By Plugging the Gaps Now

30 June 2009  |  5056 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.

OTC lifecycle control begins internally with operations

11 June 2009  |  3893 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPost-trade & opsSibosGroupAsia Financial Services.
name

Geoff Harries

job title

VP Product Strategy

company name

Fiserv

member since

2008

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
VP, Product Strategy. Responsible for product strategy, product management and product marketing...

Geoff's expertise

What Geoff reads
Geoff writes about

Who is commenting on Geoff's posts