Blog article
See all stories »

An article relating to this blog post on Finextra:

Fraudsters exploiting card verification system

UK fraud protection specialists The 3rd Man says criminals are exploiting a loophole in a payment verification system used by e-retailers in order to steal goods.


See article

Fraudsters must love the flawed card system

They aren't even really fraudsters in the old-fashioned sense of the word, more like FLAWDSTERS.
Yet another flaw uncovered in the card based transaction system? Why am I not surprised? 

Here's a deal for you, I'll prevent it all (for all UK banks) and even the card present fraud for the token sum of £145 million and I'll indemnify all users of our system against any fraud losses.

Don't you think its about time to sort it all out in one go?

I know its difficult to let go of the card, and you can even keep it, but if you must use an antique transaction system why not fortify it with a little mobile authentication. We know you want to. You all have mobiles.

I suppose there's a chances of that 37% rise to £290.5 million going down by itself?

It's time to call in the experts. At my rate the industry (the merchants and consumers) are heading towards £400 million in CNP losses alone next year.

Way to go banks, just keep on undermining that digital trust and Web 2.0 will end up with half your transactions, and Web 3.0 will take them all. 

I suggest you seriously consider the best opportunity you are ever going to get and take the offer. It isn't going to get any better, except for those of your customers (merchants and consumers) who switch to the coming alternatives.

By all means prove me wrong. See my smile.

3788

Comments: (2)

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 16 June, 2008, 21:34Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes £140M :) for the solution.
A Finextra member
A Finextra member 18 June, 2008, 11:53Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

No, not £140m, £145m. trying to short change me already?  That's a lot less than forcing the rest of the world to adopt chip and pin and then come up for something else for all the things it doesn't work with, or even providing readers for all the people who'll need them if the lame duck smart card is to be the all round solution..

It's actually even cheaper than replacing all those cards and readers every couple of years. Anyone with any lower cost solutions? It'll be £250 next year, if our pricing is in line with the Australian Banking Association's "the growth of banking fee revenue is broadly in line with national economic growth".

So I guess by this week its actually £150m. In case you didn't notice its costing over £500m each year already to do nothing except say spend £1.1bn on Chip&PIN. It's like CCTV, merely displacing the action elsewhere, until everyone ends up with a camera in their undies. In this case the gadget industry is expecting us to have both a card reader in there too. My undies are already full, thank you.

 

Member since

0

Location

0

More from member

This post is from a series of posts in the group:

Innovation in Financial Services

A discussion of trends in innovation management within financial institutions, and the key processes, technology and cultural shifts driving innovation.


See all

Now hiring