25 November 2015


Retired Member

1,294Posts 4,400,950Views 1,542Comments

Trends in Financial Services

A community to discuss the future of financial services and any other interesting trends, strategies, ideas, views.

Under pressure. Or not, as the case may be

25 April 2008  |  2106 views  |  0

Parallels can be drawn betwen the airline industry of yesterday to the clearing and settlement space of today. 

As with the emergence of Airbus, which united a disjointed European air-manufacturing market and challenged the crown of Boeing whose dominance was the result of single US airline infrastructure, the Code of Conduct on Clearing and Settlement was initiated to draw together the fragmented European post-trade landscape to emulate the cost efficiencies of the DTCC, the US’ clearing and settlement giant. 

During this week’s EC/ECB conference on the post trade space, both exchanges and clearing houses were warned that the European Commission would not accept ‘foot-dragging’ around the Code of Conduct whose core strategy in steam-lining the European market lies in linking these two groups together. 

While ‘foot-dragging’ was cited for the lack of momentum around the Code, as I sat listening to the various speakers, I couldn’t help but feel that any inertia being felt by the Commission towards the Code was predictable. 

What the Code tries to solve, rather ambitiously, is a number of separate issues relating to both market efficiency and stability – issues for which the remedies are not the same. There is also a lack of consensus around what should be the catalyst for a newly streamlined Europe, with the Commission championing competition and the majority of market users choosing consolidation. Add to this pot the complications of differing political structures and varying vested interests across the Eurozone and the result is quite a potent mix. 

With what seems to be normal practice for European initiatives, public-sector officials are faced with a confusing array of divergent opinion because the industry lacks a pan-European trade association which can act as project manager.  

The Code has encountered problems because, unlike the T+1 initiative in the US, early in this decade, Europe does not have the equivalent of SIFMA in the US, which managed the T+1 project, engaged the market and drove the initiative forward. With the frequency at which new financial initiatives are hitting European shores one can only hope that in time we will learn that appropriate levels of guidance, support and pressure are needed from a higher power to make those dreams a reality.

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Retired

Big Data Pitfalls: The Amateur Data Scientist

26 October 2015  |  1609 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsInnovation

Reflections on FinovateFall: Mobile, Money and Millennials

24 September 2015  |  1078 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

Interoperability: Prerequisite for Next Generation of Mobile Money

08 September 2015  |  1899 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

Think More Broadly: Banks CAN Monetize Cash Transactions

31 August 2015  |  1560 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsPaymentsInnovation

Software development in the retail FX Industry

28 August 2015  |  386 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsTrade execution

Retired's profile

job title
member since 2014
Summary profile See full profile »

Retired's expertise

What Retired reads
Retired writes about

Who's commenting on Retired's posts

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Brendan Burge
Astrid Mitchell
Balasubramaniam GD
Tony Ballardie
Graham Seel
Bjorn Soland
John Candido
Gregg Weintraub
Stanley Epstein
Charmaine Oak
Roy Vella