18 April 2014

Finblog

Paul Penrose - Finextra

307 | posts 1,184,240 | views 233 | comments

Finexpo

This community space has been established to keep participants up-to-date with Finexpo conference and exhibition news, and as a forum for discussion of the key challenges facing the capital markets industry

Credit risk transfer: Where did it all go so wrong?

02 April 2008  |  3706 views  |  0

"A few fundamental tenets of sound financial judgment appear to have been violated."

That's the typically understated view of the Bank for International Settlements, in its first official review of the havoc wreaked on the financial markets by wanton abuse of credit risk transfer instruments.

The central bankers bank first reviewed the CRT market (defined in the context of credit derivative-related transactions) back in March 2005. It observed a market  characterised by significant product innovation, an increasing number of market participants, growth in overall transaction volumes, and perceived continued profit opportunities for financial intermediaries.

It concluded that "continued development of the CRT market offers potential benefits in the form of more liquid and efficient markets for the transfer of credit risk" and finished with a series of recommendations for market participants and supervisors in the areas of risk management, disclosure, and supervisory approaches. 

So where did it all go so badly wrong? 

"The originate-to-distribute model created incentives that resulted, in some cases, in weak origination standards for products such as subprime mortgages," states the BIS in today's review. "Some investors placed excessive reliance on credit rating agency ratings, doing minimal or no in-house due diligence on the CRT products employed. Firms also appear to have had few, if any, risk management processes in place to address risk exposures associated with off-balance sheet entities such as structured investment vehicles (SIVs)."

These are fairly fundamental failings. Unsurprisingly, the BIS has updated its recommendations from a few years back. You can read the full report here.

TagsRisk & regulationWholesale banking

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Paul

ANZ and Visa lose the plot

30 June 2011  |  5542 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsMobile & onlineRetail banking

Don't give up the day job...ever

20 May 2010  |  4925 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0 TagsTrade executionWholesale bankingGroupWhatever...

Now we are ten

19 April 2010  |  5395 views  |  3  |  Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingWholesale banking

Finextra's Best of the Web

05 March 2010  |  4816 views  |  1  |  Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingWholesale banking

The ATM was the last great financial innovation

25 February 2010  |  8079 views  |  8  |  Recommends 0 TagsRetail bankingWholesale bankingGroupFinance 2.0
name

Paul Penrose

job title

Head of Research

company name

Finextra

member since

2007

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
I'm responsible for editorial content and quality control across the full range of Finextra media...

Paul's expertise

Who is commenting on Paul's posts