Blog article
See all stories »

Should a Core Banking Vendor Build Digital Solutions?

Across the globe, IT vendors are developing new solutions to meet growing market demands in the financial sector. This demand is primarily fueled by the industry's need to offer innovative products and services to fulfill their customers' expectations. Accordingly, IT vendors are enlarging their own portfolio of products and services.

Some vendors with expertise in areas like core banking, private banking and treasury have started experimenting on digital platforms to develop applications for mobile and mobile devices in response to consumer demand. Their domain knowledge in banking and financial services goes a long way in helping them create the right digital applications. As these digital applications are generally peripheral to, and integrated with, the core banking system, a core banking vendor with adequate expertise can also venture into this space. In fact, since the core banking vendor is well aware of the inbuilt functionalities and features of the back end system, it knows the right touch points for integration, and how to provide integrated business functionality through the digital system.

A few core banking vendors have tasted success and have been able to expand and develop a digital portfolio, but others have fallen way behind. Overall, it was easy for these vendors to experiment and test the new solution within their captive market of existing customers who were also more receptive to a new solution from a trusted partner. That being said, this is not always the case, and vendors should be prepared for a stringent evaluation process. The feedback from existing customers must be treated as an important indicator of the standing of the new product.

Vendors must be aware that expertise in core banking solution development, while useful, is no guarantor of success in digital solution development. This requires:

a) Understanding the digital technology or platform

b) Understanding the market requirement

c) Understanding consumers, their tastes and preferences

d) A simple user interface and navigation

e) Ease of integration etc.

Though some of these apply to core banking as well, the digital solution should be sleeker and more consumer-connected compared to the former, whose primary users are bank staff. Strong knowledge of advanced digital technologies, innovative thinking to keep pace with changing demands, a customer friendly attitude, reliability and security are a must.

The vendor should also ensure that in developing new solutions, it does not compromise its core strength in core banking. Market leadership in core banking does not automatically translate into a warm reception in the digital space. Familiarity with technology and programming language does not matter as much as digital domain expertise and market awareness. The vendor will face tough competition from the many proven vendors of digital solutions.

To conclude, the core banking vendor should examine the pros and cons of developing a digital solution to ensure that it does not affect the development of core banking, where it already has an established presence. The vendor can hire market experts rather than depend on core banking developers in case of a shortage of resources. The vendor must invest in digital solution fully aware that it will not achieve the same success as before unless the solution has something different to offer. It can also look at acquiring established market players and develop their products rather than build from scratch. A multi-pronged business strategy should consider all relevant aspects before actual development. It might be ideal to have a separate set of domain and technical experts collaborate with the core banking software experts and developers. This will ensure the development of a suitable product which can address the requirements of the tech savvy end users .The digital solution strategy must accommodate the periodic change in market demands. Building a portfolio of solutions in the digital space is necessary for core banking solution providers, but even more necessary is a well-thought out market entry strategy. 

4276

Comments: (3)

Ketharaman Swaminathan
Ketharaman Swaminathan - GTM360 Marketing Solutions - Pune 10 November, 2014, 13:091 like 1 like

A bank that uses a CBS that you might be aware of wanted to get an instant account opening portal developed. For precisely the same perceived advantages mentioned in your blog post, the bank invited only its CBS vendor to bid for this digital solution. But when it received the proposal, the time-to-market and price quoted by the CBS vendor were completely out of whack. The bank started doubting whether its CBS vendor was really as strong on domain, integration touchpoints and technical skills as the bank had originally given it credit. Long story short, the bank placed the order for its digital solution on another vendor. Moral of story: Claiming superiority in words is not enough. An incumbent vendor must back its claims in action with faster delivery period or lower price or some other concrete customer benefit.

João Bohner
João Bohner - Independent Consultant - Carapicuiba 11 November, 2014, 14:07Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Yes, they should!

 

But first they have to change the traditional way of handling financial activities (a.k.a. core systems).

 

“The more direct control that a customer has to understand and manage its financial position, more confidence it will have in the bank holding its assets.”

 

The purpose of the banking business is not to build technology, but to use technology to make the banking business agile, efficient, and complete.

 

Bankers do not know Technology.

ITyers do not know Business.

Then you create a vicious circle where you cannot modify the business because of IT, and you cannot create a new IT because business cannot be modified!

 

The vendors, the creators of technology, have the responsibility to build solutions to improve the performance of the business!

Remember the saying of Henry Ford: “If I asked people what they wanted, they’d have said ‘faster horses’.”

 

What is the Banking Business?

 

The Bank borrows money by x% interest and lends by y%.

Also keeps, safely, the money for customers.

It also provides some intermediary services for which it charges fees.

It maintains accurate records and history of all financial activities.

So simple is the banking business from the time it was invented by the Knights Templar until a future, not yet known.

 

As ‘cosmetics’, appear the various ways of making banking: loans, deposits, payments, recoveries, settlements, automatic debits, etc., as well as the physical means of executing them through Branches, ATMs, Internet, Mobile, NFC, Virtual Wallets, POS, Beacons ....

Here, in this area of ‘cosmetics’, is where you can create 'innovations', attract customers, new products, new ways of interactions, integration with the 'socials', geo-positioning, etc., etc...

However the basics of banking business won't change.

 

To handle swiftly those ‘cosmetics’ you have to get rid of the current ‘core banking systems’ replacing (or transforming) them by a new way of performing processes, corporately instead of by lines-of-business, with just a single source of knowledge - the ‘single truth’ - for all customer channels, management and compliances.

And all of that with simplicity, agility, and low processing cost!

 

To whom who like to exchange ideas on that, I'm available on joao.bohner@gmail.com.

 

Those are the bricks to construct the path to transform the legacy core banking systems to a new paradigm to cope with the current and future world.

 

A Finextra member
A Finextra member 19 December, 2014, 18:31Be the first to give this comment the thumbs up 0 likes

Ketharaman, it is interesting you were quick to think of a vendor that over-promised and under-delivered. A prospect for our IT company recently selected a competitor to provide an instant prescreen solution. The company seemed competent because of the confidence that the sales team portrayed, but their expertise was a far-fetched exaggeration of their abilities. After the sales team bluffed their way through the entire sales process, the developers were left with the impossible task of developing the solution. As you said claiming superiority in words is simply not enough. What I recommend to reduce project risk is to demand a consultative sales process where the sales person actively engages all necessary members of a team to identify their individual needs, and then moves on to explain their offering and value to an FI.

Now hiring