20 October 2014

Gary Wright

Gary Wright - BISS Research

277 | posts 913,833 | views 369 | comments

Post-Trade Forum

The Post Trade Forum's aim is to propagate debate and discussion between senior practitioners in Post Trade Operations in the global securities market; to bring about increased awareness and knowledge across both buy-side and sell-side financial institutions in financial products and be a focal point for firms and practitioners to air views.

Payments within T plus 2

20 April 2012  |  3633 views  |  0

As far as we know, today, the European Markets will be moving to a T+2 settlement cycle by the 4th quarter in 2013. This is a precursor harmonisation, necessary for the implementation of T2S in 2015. Sounds ok, but there are masses of operational and system concerns that firms will need to satisfy, if either T+2 or T2S will be able to be any sort of success and achieve the political aims that are pushing the change. The focus of this blog is on the ability of treasury departments and payment processing in particular, to be able to allow efficient T+2 settlements.

Settlement obviously cannot be called settlement, unless the payment proceeds are ‘good value’ in the sellers account on the settlement day, [meaning the monies are accessible for use by the sellers], which in the case of T+2 will be two days after the transaction.

Technically, this would be possible now, providing processing systems are capable and payment instructions are accurate and attached to the transaction and of course that banks allowed access to funds received into the account in real-time. But is existing operational capability able to ensure that payment details are up-to-date and reconciled to the needs of the selling investor. In most firms this important activity is not always automated and has a historical track record of missing information within the payment details. Standing instructions can account for the bulk of the payments but when an instruction needs to be bespoke a spanner can be thrown into the works. These types of problems can be time consuming and expensive to resolve. With one day less to introduce a resolution there will be more expectation on operational and system performance.

The payments industry between banks is pretty efficient on a daily basis, but in T+2 we need all parties to the settlement instruction, working at increased efficiency. So will all parties to a payment be able to work one third more efficiently than today? This includes the seller’s agents; the Broker or Custodian, as well as the Clearer and CSD and the reverse for buyers looking to apply the payment asset. The answer has to be in some considerable doubt, if the number of todays failed payments and industrial problem resolution, is any guide.

All this and more will be debated in the Post Trade Forum on T2S on the 26th June,  where the industry panel will examine the future structure of European Clearing and Settlement Markets and how firms must prepare now, for the biggest change in settlements for over a generation.        

Comments: (0)

Comment on this story (membership required)
Log in to receive notifications when someone posts a comment

Latest posts from Gary

Wealth Management - Turkeys Vote for Christmas

27 September 2013  |  2631 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

The future of systems in financial services

29 July 2013  |  2583 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

Social media and trust in financial markets

25 June 2013  |  4866 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

Technology changing the markets

25 June 2013  |  2525 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0

Technology begins to change

14 June 2013  |  2076 views  |  0  |  Recommends 0
name

Gary Wright

job title

Analyst

company name

BISS Research

member since

2007

location

London

Summary profile See full profile »
CEO of B.I.S.S. Research, founder of the BISS Independent Accreditation for all systems and servi...

Gary's expertise

Who is commenting on Gary's posts